Proxmark3 community

Mashid0

Contributor

Registered: 2019-12-02

Posts: 28

chinese magic backdoor command

current release
bootrom: RRG/Iceman/master/64d08de 2019-12-12 11:58:35
       os: RRG/Iceman/master/64d08de 2019-12-12 11:58:44
  compiled with GCC 5.4.1 20160919 (release) [ARM/embedded-5-branch revision 240496]

hf search or hf 14a
not informs about the support of chinese magic backdoor
before it was been like

Answers to chinese magic backdoor commands: NO

now
only in case the backdoor is present we got

[+] Magic capabilities : Gen 1a

My be it's a good idea to provide negative report also (like RATS not supported)

[+] Magic capabilities : NO

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,537

Website

Re: chinese magic backdoor command

Funny thing, it did report negative before but I saw an other version which didn't have it and I thought it made it much clear like this.
Which leads to the answer.  no, I am not changing it.

Mashid0

Contributor

Registered: 2019-12-02

Posts: 28

Re: chinese magic backdoor command

The question was been because i found this "lost" in current builds.

Yes, there are two way
- provide full information including empty fields (over informative)
- provide only fields with result can be used (clean)

Now your concept is clear for me,
this field no "lost" but removed, to make interface more clean and focused.
Thank you.

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,537

Website

Re: chinese magic backdoor command

Yes,  the concept is to bring a consistent, clear, intuitive interface. 
Even if some parts are complex,  you should find your way around and expect the same named commands to behavie the same. 
Now, that is a hard thing to pull off since the Proxmark3 project has been built in wild during most its lifetime. 

But we try.