Proxmark3 community

Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.

Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.


"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord

Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.

#1 2015-06-21 14:29:28

kristian1991
Member
Registered: 2015-06-21
Posts: 8

Upgrade to 2.0.0 Problems

I have updated to 2.0.0 and unfortunately the Em410 functions do not work. Also i am not able to clone to HID at all. It says something and then doesn't do anything.

I updated because i was interested in understanding AWID better but to no avail. I believe I have the blocks ready but can't seem to write them to T5557.

Best regards and appreciate your help in advance.

Offline

#2 2015-06-21 15:57:59

iceman
Administrator
Registered: 2013-04-25
Posts: 9,538
Website

Re: Upgrade to 2.0.0 Problems

if you provide with error message, traces,  we might be able to help you. However if you write so vague terms there is nothing to go on.

Offline

#3 2015-06-21 15:59:42

marshmellow
Contributor
From: US
Registered: 2013-06-10
Posts: 2,302

Re: Upgrade to 2.0.0 Problems

not sure what you mean by the Em410 functions do not work.  the t55xx write timings were adjusted to values that appears to not work with some antennas/tags.  there is a pull request on github that fixes this.

Offline

#4 2015-08-03 12:24:10

kristian1991
Member
Registered: 2015-06-21
Posts: 8

Re: Upgrade to 2.0.0 Problems

My apologies iceman and marshmellow, unfortunately when i posted this i was very new to the community and had limited knowledge, i have successfully updated bootrom, os, and FPGA and everything seems to be working property on the non GUI build on my mac.

Thank you for your replies.

I have a separate issue with a tag that i cannot identify i have put below some of the replies back for PM3

proxmark3> lf search u
Reading 30000 bytes from device memory
         
Data fetched         
Samples @ 8 bits/smpl, decimation 1:1           
NOTE: some demods output possible binary
  if it finds something that looks like a tag         
False Positives ARE possible
         

Checking for known tags:
         

No Known Tags Found!
         

Checking for Unknown tags:
         
Possible Auto Correlation of 3840 repeating samples         

Using Clock:40, Invert:0, Bits Found:750         
ASK/Manchester decoded bitstream:         
0000000000000000
0000111111111001
1000000000000000
1000100000000101
0001010011000111
1010110111110111
0000000000000000
0000111111111001
1000000000000000
1000100000000101
0001010011000111
1010110111110111
0000000000000000
0000111111111001
1000000000000000
1000100000000101
0001010011000111
1010110111110111
0000000000000000
0000111111111001
1000000000000000
1000100000000101
0001010011000111
1010110111110111
0000000000000000
0000111111111001
1000000000000000
1000100000000101
0001010011000111
1010110111110111
0000000000000000
0000111111111001

Offline

#5 2015-08-03 12:40:52

iceman
Administrator
Registered: 2013-04-25
Posts: 9,538
Website

Re: Upgrade to 2.0.0 Problems

How about you start a new thread in the LF section instead where you also save the trace (data save) and upload it.
And upload an image of the "data plot" window.
That will help out the identification process.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB